So the people at the courthouse won’t take your papers.

Briefcase SeriesIt has been brought to my attention lately that several people are having difficulties serving papers on the courts.  In fact, justices are now ordering clerks to refuse accepting papers served to them by “defendants”.

There is actually a logical and valid reason why this is happening.  Although previously pre se litigants were being allowed to submit paperwork into the court files through the court clerk that never has been the correct and proper way to submit your motions and other documents.

What is actually happening is that the justices are demanding more correct behavior by individuals defending without lawyers or legal aids.  As a result I strongly suggest that everyone wishing to fight for themselves read and learn their local “Rules of Civil Procedures” as this is what the justices are expecting from you.

With that said, the proper means to submit your documents, no matter what they are or say, is to “serve” them on the prosecutor.  There are actually businesses that do this for a living but it’s the simplest thing to do.  Ever.  In order to “properly serve” the prosecutor all you have to do  is actually and factually hand them the document you want them to review and submit into the file.  That’s it.  And that is what the justices and other court personnel are wanting you to do.  They aren’t saying you can’t submit documents.  They are saying that if you do you have to do it properly so that the prosecutor has a fair opportunity to review it and respond or make a decision about what to do next in light of your papers.

Now I realize some of you may be thinking “I’m a sovereign! I don’t have to follow their rules!!” and you are correct.  As long as you never enter into their “house”.  If you are, however, unfortunately and inappropriately attacked by one of their psycho tax collectors, and you decide to protect your person from them, then you must enter into their house and thus you must follow their rules while you are there.  I have found that justices and prosecutors have actually provided some very useful advice to self litigant people and simply listening can be very useful.

So next time a clerk or justice says you can’t submit papers into the court file, don’t get mad.  Get proper and serve them on the prosecutor.  Also, don’t request that they accept your documents.  Place them in their hands so they have to take them and then they are properly and legally served.  At that point they are obligated to act upon your papers and they must place them in the court file for you.

Think about that next time and as always, comment, rate and subscribe.

Rob

About Rob

I have over 10 years experience assisting people at looking at their problems and shifting focus so that they can begin to resolve the issues at hand. I don't "practice" psychological principles or homeopathic disciplines, I actually help real people learn how to shift their focus and see things in a different light. A light where they have the power and ability to resolve their issues practically and successfully.
Bookmark the permalink.

11 Comments

  1. Faxing them works too Rob. Number of times where we have faxed the Crown on a number of occasions and then in turn been told by the justice that they have seen the new entries in the court file. Rules of Civil Procedure dictate when those faxes can be sent (based upon time of day and number of pages)
    Now if someone wanted to enter something into the record through the clerk they can, but they must show proof to the clerk/court that they correctly served the opposing party

    • Thanks for the tip on faxing the information. As you point out the key thing is that you have to show that you served your opponent as that is key.

  2. The cop is an agent for the Corporation of the City, County, or State, he is not a member of the government at all, while his pay must be from the US Treasury and all bills issued by a Grand Jury must be made to the US Treasury.

    The very demand that you pay a private treasury is a demand for a bribe. The cop in reality is a Corpora Ficta employee and not a government employee at all. He has no powers of a government official whatsoever.

    License and registration produces commercial connection/nexus to Corporate City, County or State. License and registration are commercial agreements and not contracts. If one is not involved in commercial activity then there is no exercise of a privilege that must be licensed and registered.

    When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a summons to Court, the cop is now impersonating an officer of the court. He is then not part of any of the branches of the government, as an employee of the Pretend Government Corporation, a Corpora Ficta employee.

    When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a summons to Court, the cop is giving you a bill of exchange. You cannot lawfully sign a bill of exchange, because you are not receiving the original copy.

    When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a summons to Court, the cop is giving you a bill of attainder unlawfully, as you are not a public servant and there is a jury required to convict you to make it lawful.

    No one person can serve in two branches of the government at the same time. Only a sheriff can execute (serve) a summons, or compulsory legal process, and the cop is clearly not a member of the executive branch of the government and the ticket is pure fraud.

    In summary, cops in traffic stops are impersonating government officials on an emergency and the one being stopped is the emergency. Cops try to get people to validate their fraud. Cops impersonate judicial officers, impersonate being a Sheriff who is an executive officer, violate the principal of separation of powers, and impersonate a court bailiff by signing the false summons thereby impersonating a judicial officer a second time. The entire summons is a total fraud because it is not a government document at all; it is a corporate document being forced upon private People.

    Questions for a public Servant:

    1) Do you understand that under Trezevant v. City of Tampa that I will be charging you 1000 per minute?

    2) Where is the emergency?

    3) Do you understand under Macias V. Ihde, if you are obstructing my rights, you may be liable, in both your personal and public capacity?

    4) Are you aware that all of your individual assets can and will be lawfully subject to seizure by lien(s) which cannot be removed by any court of law, but only by me, for high crimes and misdemeanors?

    5) Are you aware that anything you do or say can be used against you?

    6) Do you consider yourself to be above the law?

    7) Are you aware that you are contracting with me?

    8) Whom do you work for, the state, county or city?

    9) Can you state for the record which branch of the government you work for-

    Elective, Judicial, or Executive?

    10) Do you have a valid oath of office and faithful performance bond on file with the Secretary of State of New Mexico?

    11) Do you have your valid DBA validly registered with the Secretary of State of New Mexico?

    12) Are you aware that impersonating a government employee is a high crime and misdemeanor?

    13) Do you believe that you are the injured party?

    14) Where is the strict-proof of assessment of damages from the injured party?

    15) Have you sworn to uphold the Constitution of the united states of America?

    16) Were you solely representing your agency or were there others with you?

    17) Do you understand that the US Constitution trumps all law?

    • No one is requesting an attorney assist us. It’s the fact that one person told me the justice ordered the clerk not to allow him to put documents in the court file and another friend recently had documents removed and was told by the prosecutor that he did it because they weren’t properly served on him. I’m providing the information given by the prosecutor himself on how to serve documents and get them into the court file so they have to be acknowledged. What moron would hire a lawyer to represent him knowing anything about how the legal system and BAR operate?!?

  3. What branch of the government is a cop, the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch or the Judicial Branch? IF the cop is not part of the three branches of government, then he is a Corpora Ficta employee, committing embezzlement of funds for his employment and high crimes under PRETENDED authority of government. The cop has no power of government and uses gang like tactics for force compliance with his will alone.

    Any other law, besides Constitutional law, is foreign law such as Napoleonic law, Uniform Commercial Code, Civil Law, color of any State law, any State statute, any State ordinance, any State regulation, or any State custom or any State usage. The officer is striking against the constitutional form of government by using foreign law! Under the 11th Amendment, other states cannot participate in out of state violations of the law, driver’s license searches without a warrant, or even credit checks without a grand jury warrant!

    5 USC § 3331 Oath of office: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    US Constitution Article. II. Section. 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

    Westin, The Wire-Tapping Problem, 52 Col. L. Rev. 165 (1952).What is perhaps even more noteworthy is its pervasive disregard in practice by those who as law officers owe special obedience to law. What is true of the federal Act against wiretapping and its violations is widely true of related state legislation and its disobedience. Few sociological generalizations are more valid than that lawlessness begets lawlessness.

    18 USC 1918 1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

    If the cop writes a ticket he’s impersonating a grand jury, as they are the only ones who can summons you to answer. Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.

    When the cop serves the summons, an impersonation of a Sheriff is taking place. The Sheriff is a member of the executive branch of government. The day-to-day enforcement and administration of federal laws is permitted, NOT STATE CODES, REGULATIONS OR STATUTES. Therefore the cop is only enforcing statutes in violation of the law, as vigilantes.

    When the cop forces you to sign the ticket, he’s impersonating a Bailiff. The Bailiff is a member of the judicial branch of the government. The cop is not a part of the government at all and the demand to appear does not come from the government at all.

    The cop is not a civil officer of the judiciary and the summons did not come from any court. The ticket under threat of torture is pure fraud.

    When the cop commits any crime he is a trespasser ab initio. The cop owes special duty to the law and when he becomes the “LAW”, not the servant of the law, he becomes a trespasser ab initio.

    It is a felony for the cop to turn on emergency lights when there is no (LIFE OR DEATH) emergency.

    It is perjury to make a statement that you are driving when you are not a Taxi DRIVER, Limo DRIVER, Truck Driver or Shuttle DRIVER, as licenses and registrations are only required for commercial activity; that means business ONLY. In the LAW, people have the right to travel as a part of one’s right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    When the cop then asks for your “PAPERS PLEASE” he becomes a communist, wherein only a Grand Jury can demand you to answer.

    When the cop acts on behalf of a private bank or private county treasury, he is in fact demanding a bribe.

    When the cop holds you for even one minute, it is a fact of law that is arrest without a Grand Jury Indictment.

    The Cop can only hold you to answer if you are a public servant and subject to impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors, without a Grand Jury summons.

    When the cop works as a Corpora Ficta employee, the cop must carry a license for the firearm they have on their person.

    When the cop without an injured party, is now acting as an injured party wherein there is a conflict of interest as the cop is only there to write a illegal writ of attainder, not protect the public from all enemies foreign and domestic.

    The cop is an agent for the Corporation of the City, County, or State, he is not a member of the government at all, while his pay must be from the US Treasury and all bills issued by a Grand Jury must be made to the US Treasury.

    The very demand that you pay a private treasury is a demand for a bribe. The cop in reality is a Corpora Ficta employee and not a government employee at all. He has no powers of a government official whatsoever.

    License and registration produces commercial connection/nexus to Corporate City, County or State. License and registration are commercial agreements and not contracts. If one is not involved in commercial activity then there is no exercise of a privilege that must be licensed and registered.

    When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a summons to Court, the cop is now impersonating an officer of the court. He is then not part of any of the branches of the government, as an employee of the Pretend Government Corporation, a Corpora Ficta employee.

    When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a summons to Court, the cop is giving you a bill of exchange. You cannot lawfully sign a bill of exchange, because you are not receiving the original copy.

    When the Cop writes you a ticket for infracting a code, regulation or statute with a summons to Court, the cop is giving you a bill of attainder unlawfully, as you are not a public servant and there is a jury required to convict you to make it lawful.

    No one person can serve in two branches of the government at the same time. Only a sheriff can execute (serve) a summons, or compulsory legal process, and the cop is clearly not a member of the executive branch of the government and the ticket is pure fraud.

    In summary, cops in traffic stops are impersonating government officials on an emergency and the one being stopped is the emergency. Cops try to get people to validate their fraud. Cops impersonate judicial officers, impersonate being a Sheriff who is an executive officer, violate the principal of separation of powers, and impersonate a court bailiff by signing the false summons thereby impersonating a judicial officer a second time. The entire summons is a total fraud because it is not a government document at all; it is a corporate document being forced upon private People.

    Questions for a public Servant:

    1) Do you understand that under Trezevant v. City of Tampa that I will be charging you 1000 per minute?

    2) Where is the emergency?

    3) Do you understand under Macias V. Ihde, if you are obstructing my rights, you may be liable, in both your personal and public capacity?

    4) Are you aware that all of your individual assets can and will be lawfully subject to seizure by lien(s) which cannot be removed by any court of law, but only by me, for high crimes and misdemeanors?

    5) Are you aware that anything you do or say can be used against you?

    6) Do you consider yourself to be above the law?

    7) Are you aware that you are contracting with me?

    8) Whom do you work for, the state, county or city?

    9) Can you state for the record which branch of the government you work for-

    Elective, Judicial, or Executive?

    10) Do you have a valid oath of office and faithful performance bond on file with the Secretary of State of New Mexico?

    11) Do you have your valid DBA validly registered with the Secretary of State of New Mexico?

    12) Are you aware that impersonating a government employee is a high crime and misdemeanor?

    13) Do you believe that you are the injured party?

    14) Where is the strict-proof of assessment of damages from the injured party?

    15) Have you sworn to uphold the Constitution of the united states of America?

    16) Were you solely representing your agency or were there others with you?

    17) Do you understand that the US Constitution trumps all law?

    • “The ticket under threat of torture is pure fraud.”

      Agreed, however, they are operating under the presumption that you are a corporate “employee” working for their corporation and thus they have jurisdiction to act as they are. The facts are usually quite different and jurisdiction doesn’t exist unless you grant it to them which is what most people still do and why they operate as they do. Ignorance of the law is no excuse and the fact that most people are ignorant of the cop and prosecutors jurisdiction is no excuse for them to “get off” the charge(s) laid against them. If you do NOT know and will NOT defend your rights and authority as part of the public that they serve then you have none.

  4. So…….. what if the prosecutor won’t take the documents? I mean, for instance CPS are schneid gits…..

    • So…….. what if the prosecutor won’t take the documents? I mean, for instance CPS are schneid gits…..

      The whole point is that they are obligated to take your documents that you serve on them. As soon as I can find a program that will edit .amr files I’ll upload audio of a crown prosecutor admitting to this fact.

    • Problem is, the judicial officers, are not properly supporting and defending the state and federal bill of rights/declaration of rights, they took an oath to…first amendment applies in this situation, the only rules a court may apply is to tell you when the court house opens, closes, and if/where/ the officer may hear your matter…these are called Local Rules of the Court, and local rules do not supercede those formed by the legislature… . Now we look at one section of the bill of rights, “All men are by nature, free and independent, and have certain unalienable rights, among which, are, the right to acquire, possess and protect property, seek safety and happiness and protection.”

      Nowhere is there an exception that says, except court rules, except the vehicle code, except the penal code.

      You need to learn how to think.

      • They may not be keeping that oath because it’s commonly known amongst their society that they all have a superseding oath to the BAR. The fact is they are operating outside of their jurisdiction in most cases and the rights you quote are words on papers to the south of me. My rights don’t and never have come from a piece of paper written by a politician. They came from God and are unalienable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.